Decision in full SSS v AH, SSS v AS, SSS v SS, SSS v GA
The appeal in each case is allowed. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland (“FTS”) in each case is quashed so far as relating to activity 1 of the mobility component. Each case is remitted to the FTS for a new hearing of the ADP appeal, confined to the question of entitlement in relation to activity 1 of the mobility component.
These cases all involve claims made under the “the ADP regulations”. In each case the FTS found that the claimant scored 10 points in respect of mobility activity 1 in relation to descriptor d.
MH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2016] UKUT 531 (AAC) ; [2018] AACR 12
The Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013
